Neil Antin’s Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records-2nd Edition
(Now superseded by Third Edition which can be downloaded below)
Neil Antin’s Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records received considerable attention on the web when it was first published in May, 2020. Now, less than a year after its first publication, Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records has undergone a substantial revision. This, the Second Edition, is not merely a “fluff and buff” update but a serious, extensive reexamination of the premises with which Mr. Antin started: that record cleaning is not a mysterious dark art, that science (in his case adapted from cleaning methodologies used on critical life support systems in the Navy and applying a diverse array of third party studies that address cleaning processes, chemistry and materials science) has much to tell us about the processes and methods for achieving a “clean” record. In the process, the author defines “cleanliness” in a context that is readily accessible to the average home user and is both measurable and repeatable.
Mr. Antin benefitted by many of the questions raised by users on various audio fora about how to adapt his basic cleaning methodology to ultrasonic cleaning and to the use of chemistries that were not readily available outside of the United States. This Second Edition of the paper, which has now become a handbook rather than a monograph, follows a logical, step by step approach to record cleaning, much like the original version. However, a lot of new information and analysis has been added.
Though technical in parts, much of Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records is readily understood by laypersons. As Neil Antin is wont to say, “there are many off-ramps here”—that is, you do not have to adopt the entire methodology or set of processes he describes to benefit from his work. Even for those who have a pretty good record cleaning regime in place and are satisfied with the results they obtain can learn more of the “why” of things about how cleaning works on a molecular level, how to mitigate static, and get insight into the process of cleaning a vinyl record that is, to my knowledge, not assembled in a comprehensive way in any paper of which I’m aware.
To be sure, some of the explorations are deep and combine disciplines- for example, taking into account particulate residue and record velocity and amplitude of signal as a factor in the audibility of contaminants. We are dealing not only with very small grooves, but side wall ridges where contaminants may be trapped. What we hear (or don’t hear) is often lost in these very narrow, tiny crevasses. Cleaning at a level of precision to address the small size of the areas to be cleaned, and the ridges along the groove walls demands more than casual application of a “one size fits all” cleaning fluid and a pass through a record cleaning machine.
Among the contaminants one must contend with is the residue of the cleaning agents themselves. Thus, even if one is not a chemist or materials scientist (I am neither), reading these sections, dense as they seem, yields some perfectly reasonable conclusions that are within the grasp of the lay person with a little study and thought.
Why go through all this? There is simply no single source for this information as applied to record cleaning collected in one place and organized in a logical, step by step fashion with an explanation of what each step involves. Mr. Antin does just that and takes account of the factors or variables to be considered at each step—recognizing that something that works well in one stage may have negative effects at a later stage of the process. The goal here is to examine effective and practical approaches to record cleaning within the reach of an ordinary user of vinyl records who wishes to obtain positive results from their cleaning efforts. Much of this doesn’t involve large expenditures of money, but it does take time to understand the processes.
Mr. Antin’s multi-disciplinary approach gives us considerable insight into the factors that come into play in cleaning and determining the effectiveness of cleaning, a record. This learning can be applied to many different record cleaning approaches. You will know the “why” of it at each stage, enabling you to make some judgements about what steps in your own regime to improve or change.
Also invaluable is the study of various chemistry, compatibility, including material compatibility of the plastics from which records are made.
Much of the learning in this area as applied to records seemed to stop when vinyl died as a mainstream medium; most of the papers in the AES archive date to the ‘70s and earlier. Although a lot of information is available on the web, some of it good, some of it more ritual than science-based, and some of it borderline crazy, there is a dearth of information about the science of cleaning processes as applied to records. There is little industry funded study in this area at this point since the medium is a niche, despite the millions of records in circulation and the renewed popularity of the LP as a playback medium.
Most companies that offer products in this area treat their cleaning fluids as proprietary; most of the machinery, whether vacuum type record cleaning machines, or ultrasonic cleaners, give the user operating instructions but little more.
Reviewers are similarly limited—they will test a machine, compare results, confer with the manufacturer or supplier, and on occasion, try different fluids or steps. Generally, I think the reviewers do a good job in this respect, but they too are constrained- they are typically reviewing finished products intended to be used by consumers without a lot of modification or fiddling. The reviewers are doing the job asked of them—to review a product as it would arrive and be used in the hands of the consumer.
As readers are well aware, I’ve been an advocate of DIY ultrasonic not just because of cost effectiveness, but because one has more flexibility to design the feature set, including allowance for a rinse step. I have owned both the Audio Desk and the KL machines and both are good; the Degritter, the “new kid on the block” has received a very positive reception from users as well as the audio commentariat.
The made for records LP cleaners aren’t necessarily cheap and have limitations due to their inherent design goals: namely, to make record cleaning as easy and labor free as possible. Mr. Antin has thus expanded his paper to include a more in-depth analysis of the behavior of ultrasonic cleaning and appropriate chemistry to optimize results, given real world needs of the audiophile who has neither the time nor the expertise to analyze and compare the results of various cleaning approaches.
I could oversimplify this by saying that careful application and removal of appropriate chemistry in a clean environment, with a rinse step or two, will yield better results that are audibly noticeable. But that would blur all the fine details of Mr. Antin’s analysis and deny the reader the opportunity to learn what is really happening at each step of the way. By approaching this subject in the painstaking way he has, Mr. Antin has given us far greater insight into each step of the process. That gives the reader far more opportunity to experiment and implement cleaning methods that are best suited to a particular user’s needs, rather than providing a “one size fits all” method. As Neil Antin says, there is no “magic bullet” here—and it is not the devil that is in the details, but enlightenment.
I’m proud to publish this Second Edition of Neil Antin’s Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records. Even if you had read every word of the original edition, I think you’ll find this comprehensive revision to be well worth your time.
Though this is not an easy read or a quick one, the value of this comprehensive study should prove to be an enduring and invaluable contribution to the literature of record cleaning. I believe it should serve as a reference for those who are attempting to improve their cleaning processes with a set of meaningful guidelines to aid them and give real direction to their efforts. My thanks to Neil Antin for his tireless work on the subject. And a thanks (which I know Neil joins in) to those readers who have asked questions, experimented with some of Neil’s suggestions on the various audio fora and shared the results of their efforts.
Bill Hart
Austin, Tx.
March, 2021
feature image: Jong Marshes
smeg_it says
Bill,
First, forgive me, I was hoping to get Precision Aqueous Cleaning version 2. Specifically, because version 3 says part of the change was removing references in Chapter V to the VinylStack, and it’s what I just bought from ebay along with a cheap ultrasonic cleaner. I’m having trouble finding any manual or information. The link on the version 2 downloads version 3 (just observation, no complaint 🙂 )
Anyway,
Thank You, for publishing this, and your website. If you have a shop in Austin let me know as I head that way from time to time! I really would like to get some knowledge from people like you with more experience. Oh lastly, in your librarian interview, they said rubber “air blaster”. Just curious. I use a Rocket Air Blaster before I play an album or after flipping it, that about what they were talking about?
I’m not going to be too complex in my cleaning, but hopefully, I’ll get better as time goes on.
Hope all is well in Austin. Arlington is starting to get winter, but not daily..just yet!
Bill Hart says
All good here in Austin. No, no shop. I teach part-time at UT and get involved in some projects relating to music and archival stuff. Otherwise a retired copyright lawyer from NYC. Not sure what I can do about Version 2, let me talk to Neil.
I have a few Giotto’s Rocket Blasters- Neil found one with a HEPA filter on intake which I think is still gettable on Amazon for pretty cheap. Thanks for writing. All the heavy lifting is Neil. I’m just fortunate to be able to publish third party authors, like him, Mike Bodell and a few others.
best,
Bill Hart
Duncindee says
Hi, smeg_it
Brand-new member here; did you find it?
I think this is it here on the ‘Wayback Machine’ (Internet Archive):-
https://web.archive.org/web/20210303025627/https://thevinylpress.com/precision-aqueous-cleaning-of-vinyl-records-2nd-edition/
Same page, but 2nd Edition hyperlink, direct link here:-
https://web.archive.org/web/20210330210926/https://thevinylpress.com/app/uploads/2021/03/PAC-Vinyl-Records_2021-03-01_pdf.pdf
Groovey says
Really glad I found this site. The article on record cleaning is epic. When I bought my JVC QL Y66F turntable in the early 80s one of the selling points was it is the same motor that the library of Congress uses. I’m going to spend a lot of time here.
It’s all in one note, listen.
Simon Hickie says
Greetings from the UK!
I have found Neil Antin’s PACVR ebook by far the most comprehensive resource on vinyl record cleaning.
I’ve tried three methods:
1. The Knosti Disco Antistat three tank approach – one for clean, one for first rinse, one for second rinse.
2. A DIY ultrasonic tank (6.5 litres) with modified spinner (0.6rpm) and record spacers (designed to space three records equally at one wavelength distance between each and the sides
3. A DIY vacuum type system utilising a old Lenco L75 (tremendous torque for cleaning and vacuuming) and a DIY Vinyl Vac clone.
I have settled on the third of these methods and, based on Neil’s book, utilise the following methodology:
1. Preclean using Ecover Zero Silk and Wool, diluted at a rate of 10ml/litre
2. Vacuum semi-dry (a couple of rotations is sufficient
3. Apply an acid wash – 5% distilled white vinegar plus neat surfactant (Dehypon LS54) at 0.4ml/litre
4. Vacuum semi dry
5. Apply rinse water (I use deionised due to distilled being less readily available in the UK for sensible money)
6. Vacuum semi dry
7. Apply final cleaner – Dehypon LS54 @ 0.4ml/litre plus BAC50 @ 0.1ml/litre.
8. Vacuum dry (three rotations)
9. Air dry for a few hours.
I use goatshair brushes, a different one for each of the pre-clean, acid wash and final clean stages. I use another one for spreading rinse water. I use 250ml ‘pipetted’ squeeze bottles for all the liquids.
I use different 8″ mats (craft foam stuck to cork) on my Lenco: one for facing the record ‘dirty’ side and one for facing a cleaned side. The mats are undersized to prevent fluids tracking to the underside of the record.
A single record takes about 20 minutes to clean properly, plus final air drying time.
Records are resleeved in new poly lined inner sleeves, with the old inners kept if there’s something interesting/original on them. I then house the whole thing in a new LDPE outer sleeve. I should probably give the record outer sleeve the once over too.
Overall, I have found this method to give excellent results. I also find it more efficient than either the Knosti or Ultrasonic methods. One gets a fresh slug of cleaning solution for each side of a record with reduced risk of cross contamination. It’s also more economical. I estimate that 250ml of cleaning solution is good for about 20 records.
So may I thank Neil for his tremendous contribution to the literature on record cleaning and Bill Hart for making it freely available.
Simon Hickie says
I missed out the final rinse after step 8: Apply rinse and vacuum dry.