home

The Vinyl Press

  • Features
  • Records
  • Cleaning – Care
  • Editorials
  • Compendia
  • Ephemera
  • Phono
  • About
You are here: Home / Cleaning - Care / Vinyl LP Cleaning- A Photo Essay

Vinyl LP Cleaning- A Photo Essay

July 6, 2015 by Bill Hart

 

Readers new to vinyl LP cleaning might benefit from this quick photo essay.

Having just posted a capsule review of The Doobie Brothers- Toulouse Street on the site, I happened to notice another early copy in my “to be cleaned” pile.  It was a cheap bin find from some record store in Texas that was shipped back to NY with several hundred other records of mine:

IMG_0120

It looks like I paid $4.99 for this one and it is a pretty early pressing from the Columbia Santa Maria plant.

 

Under “normal” light, and in the kinds of photos you’ll often see on the web, it looked OK for a cheap record:

IMG_0121No deep scratches, or other visually obvious fatal flaws; frankly, I don’t remember how closely I inspected this record when I bought it.

Under a strong light, here’s what the record really looked like:

 

IMG_0122

What you are seeing there is surface stuff that may or may not be embedded into the grooves, along with the kinds of scratches that are common on well-played older records (more in the nature of “scuffs” than what collectors refer to as ‘feelable’ scratches which are likely to affect play). But who knows, right? It certainly wasn’t pristine.

Looking at the deadwax, this is what bright light shows:

 

IMG_0123Water-spotting, dried onto the surface. Who knows what this is? Just water? Some cleaning agent? Something else? Rest assured, if that’s what the non-grooved area looked like, that stuff, whatever it is, was also clogging the grooves, along with who knows what else.

 

So, we clean the record. For the first side, I’m going to use a “big gun” machine, the Keith Monks. I don’t usually use the “automated” dispensing head on the Monks, but prefer to hand apply whatever fluid I’m using for the particular record:

 

IMG_0124

In this case, I’m using a fairly mild fluid from Hannl of Germany which is sold in concentrated form.  I mix it with 2 liters of reagent water (highly purified ‘lab’ water). I like the Hannl on the Monks because it applies easily and works very effectively on all but the worst records (and by worst, it is often not what you see that’s the problem but the stuff that’s embedded into the grooves).

One nice thing about the Monks is that you can actually vacuum the deadwax, so after applying the fluid, I started the vacuum arm as close to the label as possible, having wetted that area too:

 

IMG_0126This is not so easy to do with other machines. Once the cleaning fluid has been vacuumed, I do another pass, using a separate brush to apply a lab water ‘rinse’ and then vacuum that off.  Here’s what that side looks like now, in the non-grooved area:

IMG_0128

I know the label is out of focus, but I’m aiming at the deadwax area- no more water spotting. (At least it looks much better).

I decided to do the other side on my old VPI. Here’s the set-up:IMG_0129It is a positively ancient 16 that was upgraded to a 16.5 back in the early 1980’s. (The particle board seams are splitting on the case, the case work is stained -but the darn thing still works. I keep the “turntable area” of the machine very clean, and it has a plexi-style lid to keep out the dust). Note the multiple vacuum wands, mounted in arm ‘pillars’ so they can be quickly changed out; one is for fluid/cleaning, and the other for the ‘pure’ water rinse step. I use two applicators, one for each step too. Also note that I am using “audiophile approved” butter dishes, turned upside down; these enable me to rinse off the applicators with pure water, to keep them clean during a record washing session and the dishes give me a place to rest the applicators and vacuum wands. (I use a toothbrush to scrape the velvet lips on the vacuum wands).

 

So, we now clean the other side of the record using this very basic VPI machine that has cleaned miles of grooves over the course of more than three decades:

 

IMG_0130Wash step, applying AIVS No. 15, which is an enzyme-based cleaner. You apply, agitate and let sit. I shut the VPI motor off while the fluid is doing its thing. It can be a minute or two, or much longer, depending on how nasty the record is. I usually turn the motor back on, add a little more fluid, and agitate some more. Then vacuum:

IMG_0131A couple of revolutions- if you “over-vacuum,” you can create a static charge.

Then, the rinse step, using a separate applicator:

IMG_0132Note the blue “rubber band” around the handle- that’s my high-tech way of marking the applicator as the “rinse” applicator. I do the same thing for the rinse vacuum wand pillar, which switches out in no time from the fluid/cleaner/vacuum wand-pillar:

IMG_0133 (1)

A few vacuum cycles to remove the ‘rinse’ water, and we’re basically done. So, we’ve cleaned this cheap, but potentially great sounding record using two different methods- one, using a very high-end record cleaning machine, and the other side, using a pretty basic, and old, vacuum machine. The real test, of course, is how it sounds. So, I’ll fire it up:

IMG_0134

So, how does it sound? Pretty great! It may actually be a better sounding copy than the one I reviewed elsewhere on the site. Was there any noticeable sonic difference between the side cleaned with the uber Monks machine and the old VPI? Not a pronounced difference, in this case. Am I suggesting that the machines are equal in their cleaning ability? Not exactly. For some of the reasons explained in greater detail in one of  my earlier pieces on cleaning, the Monks can really pull stuff out of the grooves and its design minimizes cross-contamination from the cleaning machine to the record. I also didn’t do the additional ultrasonic cleaning that is a usual step in my cleaning regime, just to keep the playing field level. My aim wasn’t so much to compare the Monks to the VPI, but instead, to show that even with a basic vacuum machine, you can get a lot of the crud off a record pretty effectively, at a relatively modest cost. (Thus, adding an ultrasonic step would defeat the purpose of this illustration). And, the record still isn’t perfect looking- it has those scuffs, which cleaning won’t remove, and there is some apparent discoloration of the vinyl on one side.

The one thing I did not do is play the uncleaned record to compare it against the result of cleaning; mainly because I didn’t want to subject my stylus/cartridge to totally unknown terrain. (In fairness, I’ve also had records that underwent very intense multi-step cleaning that I pulled off the table immediately because it was clear that they were damaged, and no amount of cleaning was going to salvage them).

I’m not offering this as “scientific proof” of anything, but instead, a quick anecdotal essay on the merits of cleaning records, with some visuals to help the uninitiated. If you are mining the field for older pressings, you’ll eventually have to come to grips with record cleaning at some point. And if there is any moral to the story, it’s this: you don’t have to spend a fortune to do it effectively.

N.B. The now cleaned record goes into a fresh inner sleeve; the original inner, if it has any artifact value (and it may if it is an older record) gets stored separately with the record and any other paper goods, posters, or associated memorabilia that originally accompanied the record. In a later piece, I can walk through some of the steps I use to package and store records, as well as my quick way of tagging various pressings to quickly identify them.

Bill Hart

July 6, 2015

 

 

Filed Under: Cleaning - Care, In Brief

In Brief:

Incoming- Mrs. Henry Keep on Rising

Mrs. Henry Keep on Rising   A 21st century rock opera? Recorded to tape? And mastered at Bernie Grundman’s shop? I’ve started to explore this box (3 LPs, 2 CDs and a substantial book) in more depth and plan on interviewing the producer in an upcoming piece. … [Read More...]

Power to the People-Back Up Generator

    Shortly after the Texas "big freeze" in February 2021, I contacted various vendors of back up generators. Some did not bother to respond, a few came out, ostensibly to give me a quote and I never heard from them again. One vendor did send me a blank form with a very high total price, without completing the cost analysis for running gas lines, electrical wiring and the other things that are "adds" to the cost of the generator itself.  I kicked this around for a while-- given the heat in Central Texas during the summer--110F for days on end, we got constant warnings last summer (2023) to reduce power consumption, lest we suffer rolling blackouts. And then there's the fact that Austin really isn't "built" for freezing temperatures. Black ice with no road crews, downed power lines, and demand that teeters off the edge of power failure catastrophe. I do not want to go into the power grid … [Read More...]

Incoming-Know what I mean?

Cannonball Adderley's "Know what I mean? is a warhorse, to be sure,but one that deserves its reputation. I was prompted to explore a few different pressings as a result of a thread on the Hoffman forum: https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/do-you-have-cannonball-adderley-bill-evans-know-what-i-mean-the-best-sounding-vintage-jazz-lp.1175660/  I used to shop these OJCs as bargains back in the day when Tower Records was thriving. They were a solid entry point into some very good sounding jazz--some of it "straight ahead" but well made, taken from analog masters for the most part and did I say cheap? Back in the day, these were bargain records when they were released, and until the more recent surge in prices of older LPs, could be readily found for little money.  The recent Craft reissue cut by Kevin Gray has brought renewed attention to the record. I thought it might be fun to do a … [Read More...]

We’re Back!

We’re Back! Some fresh content for your consideration. Neil Antin did some modest updates to his seminal book on Precision Aqueous Cleaning of Vinyl Records. Neil did not regard these changes as a “new version” so the download is now 3.1 with a “Record of Changes” at the end. I’ve talked to Peter Ulrich, the drummer from Dead Can Dance a few times over the years because I was fascinated by the group. They hit it big in audiophile circles with “Into the Labyrinth” which became a “demo” record with the MoFi release. I got that, but also sought out an original 4AD pressing, and as I delved into their music, bought more original copies- they were not crazy expensive at the time. When Peter told me he was doing a book on the history of his involvement with the band, I was eager to read it. It offers some great insight into a period when this band was inventing new sounds in the post-punk … [Read More...]

Drumming with Dead Can Dance: and Parallel Adventures- Peter Ulrich

  Drumming with Dead Can Dance: and Parallel Adventures Peter Ulrich   I didn’t really get on to Dead Can Dance until “Into the Labyrinth,” their most popular LP that made the audiophile rounds here in the States. 4AD, their label, wasn’t well distributed in the US when the band was first developing, it wasn’t exactly mainstream stuff here, even in the audiophile community. Yet the band had a following, starting in Australia, where Lisa Gerrard and Brendan Perry had a band and moved to a council flat in London where the two met our narrator, a soon to be jobless publicist for a theatrical/live show venue. Ulrich had the time, interest, musical background, and chops as a drummer to become part of their band. So we get the story of DCD from the outset of their adventures in England, playing local venues and developing a following. The scene was a sort of post-punk, … [Read More...]

Terms of Use ·  Copyright © 2025 The Vinyl Press.com ·  Privacy Policy
A service of Flying Reptile Media Group ·  Contact


Register | Login to Comment | Comments FAQ

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in